Digital Sovereignty for Security Teams
Digital sovereignty is now a scored line in European security tenders. Residency, jurisdiction and exit are different controls — and exposure tools are in scope.
Articles and papers on exposure management, EASM, supplier risk, AI asset discovery and digital sovereignty, from the Panop research team.
Digital sovereignty is now a scored line in European security tenders. Residency, jurisdiction and exit are different controls — and exposure tools are in scope.
Vulnerability management ranks CVEs. Exposure management ranks what is reachable in your estate. CTEM is the loop that makes the second one continuous.
EASM is the continuous discovery of internet-facing assets an attacker can find without credentials. It is an input to CTEM, not a substitute for it.
Why sovereignty moved from politics into procurement, what the term covers once broken into measurable parts, and which controls actually change who can reach your data.
Panop's autonomous pentest is scored on three public suites: XBOW, Argus, and ExploitBench. This page is the protocol. Results will be published here.
The EU expects national PQC roadmaps by end-2026 and high-risk systems migrated by 2030. FINMA expects a board-approved roadmap by mid-2027.
The four actor categories, why their boundaries are dissolving, how fast they now move, and what the Swiss reporting data says about who turns up.
AI agents act on production systems under delegated credentials, and MCP standardises that access. The real risk, the controls that break, a 90-day plan.
A midpoint view of the 2026 threat landscape: where attacks now start, what AI changed on both sides, and which regulatory deadlines land before December.
Wavestone's 2026 radar maps Switzerland's cyber startup landscape. Panop is listed among the Swiss Gems moving from attack surface management to CTEM.
No posts in this category.