Integrations
Panop plugs into the security stack you already run, validated risk reaches your team where they work.
Panop's integrations run in both directions. Asset data, ownership and business context flow in to sharpen prioritisation; validated, ranked risk flows out as a ticket for the asset owner, context for your SIEM, updates for your CMDB and evidence for your auditors. A REST API and a CLI expose everything Panop knows, so exposure management reaches CI/CD as well as the security stack.
Panop continuously discovers and validates what's genuinely exploitable across your attack surface. Through its REST API, CLI, Alert Manager, and native SIEM, CMDB and ticketing integrations, prioritised risk flows straight to the teams and tools that act on it.
Most exposure platforms end at the dashboard: findings pile up, and turning them into a ticket, a playbook or a SIEM event stays manual. Meanwhile AI has compressed exploit development from weeks to hours. Intelligence that waits for someone to log in, export and re-enter it arrives too late to matter.
Operationalised, exploitable risk gets fixed while it's still a finding, routed automatically to its owner, in the tool they already use, with validation context attached. Without integration, analysts re-key findings between systems while validated risk waits in a queue and the exploit window closes.
Panop doesn't stop at theoretical vulnerabilities.
Panop validates what's genuinely exploitable, prioritises it by business impact, and routes it automatically , a ticket for the asset owner, context for your SIEM, updates for your CMDB, evidence for your auditors. Define the policy once; only the decisions that need human judgment reach a human.
Panop integrations run in both directions. Asset ownership and business context flow in to sharpen how exposure is ranked, and validated risk flows back out to the system that owns the fix. Nobody re-keys a finding between consoles, so the work starts while the exposure is still a finding rather than an incident.
Three ways in, together they close the loop between what Panop finds and what your teams fix.
Everything Panop knows, assets, validated exposures, priorities, reports, available over a powerful REST API, in both directions.
Know the 10 things to fix today.
Every AI asset, known and shadow.
Continuous validation, not annual exercises.
Private Cloud under control.
NIS2. DORA. EU AI Act. Always audit-ready.
Managing Third-Party & Supplier Risk
The questions platform and security engineers ask most about connecting Panop to an existing stack.
Everything Panop knows, in both directions — assets, validated exposures, priorities and reports. The API is the same surface the product itself uses, so anything visible in the console can be read or driven programmatically. The CLI wraps it for the terminal and for CI/CD, which is how exposure checks become part of a release rather than a review after one.
No, and the inbound direction is what makes prioritisation accurate. Ownership from your CMDB, criticality ratings and business context flow into Panop and change how validated findings are ranked. Without that, a platform can tell you a finding is exploitable but not whether it sits on a system that matters to your business.
Through the Alert Manager, which escalates on policy rather than on volume. You define once what deserves attention, and only findings meeting that bar are raised, with exploitability context attached. Everything else is routed to its owner as a ticket or synced to the relevant system without interrupting anyone.
Native connectors cover the common SIEM, CMDB and ticketing destinations, and the REST API covers the rest. Because the API exposes the full object model rather than a webhook subset, an unsupported destination is an integration to write rather than a limit on what data you can get out.
