Your vendors are part of your attack surface.
Business Risk Register
likelihood × impact, traced to the exposure driving it
| ID | Business Risk | Band | L | I | Top Driver | Owner | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BR-1 | Data Breach & Confidentiality | High | 5 | 3 | Unrestricted file upload on portal | CISO | Mitigate |
| BR-2 | Operational Disruption | High | 5 | 3 | Unrestricted file upload on portal | CTO | Mitigate |
| BR-3 | Fraud & Financial Loss | High | 5 | 3 | Unrestricted file upload on portal | CFO | Accept |
| BR-4 | Regulatory & Legal Exposure | High | 5 | 3 | Deprecated TLS 1.0 on gateway | CLO | Mitigate |
| BR-5 | Reputational & Brand Damage | High | 5 | 3 | Deprecated TLS 1.0 on gateway | CMO | Mitigate |
| BR-6 | Intellectual Property Theft | High | 5 | 3 | Unrestricted file upload on portal | CISO | Mitigate |
Every band traces back to a specific, validated exposure — so the treatment decision is defensible.
Panop monitors every supplier's external posture continuously rather than through an annual questionnaire, so changes that happen between review cycles are visible when they happen. Supplier exposure is validated the same way as your own estate and ranked in the same queue, and the monitoring record doubles as the NIS2 and DORA supply chain evidence auditors ask for.
Supplier risk is assessed on an annual questionnaire cycle while supplier infrastructure changes weekly. Teams are held accountable for exposure they cannot see and cannot independently re-test.
Limited visibility into suppliers’ cloud assets, exposed services, leaked credentials, or misconfigurations.
Questionnaires and annual reviews cannot keep pace with dynamic supplier environments or emerging threats.
Regulations (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2) demand continuous visibility, while business leaders push for rapid cloud ROI without security slowing innovation.
Panop monitors supplier infrastructure continuously and turns what it finds into supply chain evidence you can put in front of a regulator.
Map each supplier's internet-facing assets, exposed services and leaked credentials without depending on what they self-report.
Firewalls & Security Groups
what is actually reachable across each boundary
Three boundaries, one route that actually connects — validated, not inferred from configuration.
Track supplier posture continuously so a change in their environment surfaces when it happens, not at the next annual review.
Identify where a supplier exposure connects to your own systems and data, and prioritise the paths that actually reach you.
Risk Evolution
exploitable chains, critical chokepoints & assets at risk over 30 days
Daily snapshots accrue over time — the trend fills in as history is recorded.
Produce the continuous third-party monitoring records that NIS2 and DORA expect, mapped to the relevant control.
Maturity Model
NIST CSF 2.0 · current profile against target
Every function is scored from live evidence, not a questionnaire — so the gap to target moves as the estate does.
Supplier posture tracked continuously rather than surveyed annually
With Panop, see what your suppliers expose before it becomes your incident.
Know the 10 things to fix today.
Every AI asset, known and shadow.
Continuous validation, not annual exercises.
Private Cloud under control.
NIS2. DORA. EU AI Act. Always audit-ready.
