For compliance officers

Stay audit-ready, every day.

Maturity Model

NIST CSF 2.0 · current profile against target

Current Target profile
GVGovern2/5IDIdentify3/5PRProtect3/5DEDetect2/5RSRespond2/5RCRecover1/5

Every function is scored from live evidence, not a questionnaire — so the gap to target moves as the estate does.

Gap to target 1.8 average across CSF functions

Compliance officers are accountable for proving that security controls actually work, not simply that they exist. As NIS2, DORA and the EU AI Act raise expectations, point-in-time assessments and manually assembled evidence struggle to keep pace with environments that change every day.

Key challenges

Compliance officers must evidence control effectiveness across multiple frameworks while environments, suppliers and AI assets keep changing underneath them.

  • Demonstrating that controls are effective, not merely documented

  • Keeping evidence current across fast-changing environments

  • Translating technical findings into regulatory obligations

How Panop helps

Panop helps compliance officers replace point-in-time snapshots with continuous, defensible evidence.

Maintain a continuously updated record of real exposure

Boundaries, security groups and reachable paths are re-checked as the estate changes, so the evidence in front of an auditor describes today rather than the quarter it was collected in.

Firewalls & Security Groups

what is actually reachable across each boundary

PUBLIC EDGEPRODUCTION VPCCORPORATEEdge APIsPublic LBIngress FirewallApp ClusterCorporate ProdREACHABLE

Three boundaries, one route that actually connects — validated, not inferred from configuration.

Map findings to the frameworks and obligations that apply

Every business risk carries its likelihood, impact, accountable owner and treatment decision, with the technical exposure behind it attached. That is the shape NIS2 and DORA ask for.

Business Risk Register

likelihood × impact, traced to the exposure driving it

IDBusiness RiskBandLITop DriverOwnerTreatment
BR-1Data Breach & ConfidentialityHigh53 Unrestricted file upload on portalCISOMitigate
BR-2Operational DisruptionHigh53 Unrestricted file upload on portalCTOMitigate
BR-3Fraud & Financial LossHigh53 Unrestricted file upload on portalCFOAccept
BR-4Regulatory & Legal ExposureHigh53 Deprecated TLS 1.0 on gatewayCLOMitigate
BR-5Reputational & Brand DamageHigh53 Deprecated TLS 1.0 on gatewayCMOMitigate
BR-6Intellectual Property TheftHigh53 Unrestricted file upload on portalCISOMitigate

Every band traces back to a specific, validated exposure — so the treatment decision is defensible.

Produce audit-ready evidence without manual collection

The record assembles itself as the platform works. Severity movement across a reporting window is already there when the question is asked, with no spreadsheet round in between.

+326/06 – 21/08
26/0621/08
Critical 27 High 203 Medium 259 Low 99

Track remediation progress against reporting deadlines

Chains and chokepoints are snapshotted daily, so you can show a regulator the direction of travel and the date a control started working, not only its end state.

Risk Evolution

exploitable chains, critical chokepoints & assets at risk over 30 days

Exploitable chains Critical chokepoints Assets at risk
12310203001/0802/0803/0804/0805/0806/0807/0808/0809/0810/0811/0812/0813/08

Daily snapshots accrue over time — the trend fills in as history is recorded.

Impact

  • Continuous audit readiness instead of pre-audit scrambles
  • Less time spent manually gathering evidence
  • Clearer mapping between technical risk and regulatory obligations
  • Faster, better-supported responses to auditors and regulators
  • Reduced duplication of effort across overlapping frameworks

Turn continuous evidence into regulatory confidence.

Explore other use cases